Cosmos (ATOM) News
Cosmos can identify its own weaknesses easier by seeing them in others.
The following (quite dense, so possibly difficult to understand) topic showcases some of Cardanos weaknesses:
To summarize: Cardano claims to use "Scientific Methods", but fails to stick even to the most basics of system-design (e.g.: "don't leave 'description' fields empty", or "have the latest-stable in a dedicated branch"). Other fails are in "Product-Orientation" (e.g. prioritize dev-user/end-user needs), e.g. "Core-Developers Fail to Provide Simplicity".
The neglected details make things quite difficult within Cardano, something that explains Cardanos slow progress.
I'm glad to see that the overall quality of Cosmos looks far better.
But still, there are many details that need to be fixed.
why cosmos still in developer mode on ledger nano?
it is any place i could follow the development?
I would like to know which are good public full nodes that I can connect to using Gaiacli config.
Is there a list or a way I can pull this information?
|24h Low / 24h High||$4.76 / $5.21|
All time high
|All time high||$7.02|
|All time high date||2019-06-18 (7 months ago)|
|Since all time high||-29.58 %|
|24 hours||-3.72 %|
|7 days||16.94 %|
|14 days||20.55 %|
|30 days||36.55 %|
|60 days||26.79 %|
|Merged pull requests||39|